Obsessed with Breasts

Truly Beautiful

2010-08-26T21:37:00.000-07:00

Here is a piece of artwork I find both compelling and arousing. Does anyone know who the artist is?

Yet Another Favorite Lactation Video

2010-03-09T18:41:00.000-08:00

In keeping with my last two posts, here's another clip from a favorite lactation video of mine. This one features Milena Velba near the beginning of her career as a huge-breasted model. Milena is another of those women upon whom Nature bestows a milk-laden bounty as a reward for childbirth. For the first year or more of her big-bust modeling career, she was lactating and seemed happy to share both her breasts and her milk with the world.

In this clip, she stops at an outdoor rest stop to relieve the pent up milk from her bosom. Here she meets a young woman who is more than happy to help her out by suckling at her breasts. With the girl spilling milk from her mouth on one side and Milena squirting it out on the other, it's a wet and sexy scene to be sure!

If you find this video link has been broken, please contact me!

Another Lactation Video

2010-03-07T14:40:00.000-08:00

After my post of Miss Twin Volcanoes drinking her own milk, I've been champing at the bit to put up another lactation video. This time I've chosen a short clip of Maxi, a BBW model who's had her own site on the 'Net for years at http://www.maximoom.com. The amazing thing about Maxi is how her breasts have continued to grow over the years. On her site, she claims "...my boobs are permanently growing and who knows if it will ever stop." Looking back at older photos of her, it's clear that they used to be much smaller, but then again Maxi was thinner then, too. So to my thinking, whether they are truly in a state of constant growth or not is an open question.

Regardless, when Maxi became pregnant a few years back, those huge breasts responded as most do and became even larger. Post-pregnancy, they are truly enormous. Her site claims she is now overflowing a 34K bra! In the video clip, she takes one of her massive mams out through the neckline of her pajama top, which looks uncomfortable given how much flesh she has to extract. She then gives her thumb-sized nipple a little flick or two and starts squeezing sweet milk from it.

I think what I like most about this video is the sense of proportion it conveys. The rest of her body is hidden under her pajamas, so there's nothing to distract the viewer from the true size of her breasts. Her hands can barely handle the jiggling mass as she struggles to pull one out, and her areolas, which must be a few inches across, are almost lost at the bottom of that pendulous mountain once it's fully come into view. Truly amazing!

A Favorite Lactation Video

2010-03-03T13:30:00.000-08:00

As I've stated previously, I've learned an appreciation for swollen, milk-laden breasts over the years. One of the first things, if not the very first, I ever saw that sparked my interest in lactation was a video segment from Wild Bill's "Erupting Volcanoes". It starred Ms. Twin Volcanoes, a big-bust model also known simply as Yolanda. Her breasts were naturally huge even before she got pregnant, a fact I was familiar with due to a pictorial I had seen of her in Gent magazine. They hung heavily on her chest and she had some of the largest areolas I had seen.

Pregnancy and birth worked the same wonders on her mammaries as they do on most - only in Yolanda's case, it was more dramatic. Her big hangers were even bigger and hung even lower than before, and her darkened nipples squirted great volumes of milk. I've posted a clip from this milestone video. In it, she kneads and massages her breasts as she enthusiastically drinks her own milk.

You can view it here. Enjoy!

If you find this video link has been broken, please contact me!

Natural Breast Lift

2009-06-05T10:41:00.000-07:00

Have you ever noticed (and if you're a real breast aficionado, you will have) that when a woman raises her arms over her head, her breasts lift, too? It brings them up in a way that looks entirely natural, and usually takes downward-pointing nipples and brings them back to where the point forward again. To illustrate, I'm including two photos of Cheron. Of course, with breasts as huge as hers, you can only expect so much lift. Her nipples still point downward a bit, but on smaller breasts the effect is more dramatic. Still, I think the photos make my point.

It's a nice, not-so-subtle effect that would be a gold mine if plastic surgeons could duplicate it. So my question is, why can't they? Maybe there is some connective tissue that could be shortened and stitched back together so that the breasts will remain in that elevated position. And wouldn't it be perfect if they could do it with just a few small incisions, leaving virtually no evidence that it had been done? To me, that is the holy grail of cosmetic breast surgery: a lift that leaves no evidence it's been done, and has a completely natural looking result.

A Content Warning at Last

2009-06-02T23:26:00.000-07:00

Well, it finally happened. After being here for years, I've finally gotten flagged with a content warning. Starting in the last few days, you can't get to my blog without acknowledging that you want to see mature content.

Why did it take so long to happen? I've always liked to think that it's because I present my subject in a tasteful way, despite the sexual nature of it. I make the effort not to post any hardcore material, and keep my own language within certain bounds. Or perhaps, as I've speculated at times, the fact that I put a content warning in the blog myself had taken care of anyone offendable who inadvertently stumbled upon my blog. But maybe none of that is it. Maybe it's just that I get so little traffic that it took this long for someone offendable to finally land here. I guess I'll never know

Nelli Roono

2009-05-04T15:57:00.000-07:00

As another example of how there are more and more huge natural breasts on the 'Net to be enjoyed these days, consider Nelli Roono. I've written before about our ever increasing bounty of amazing naturals (see here), and Nelli fits into this crop without a doubt!

Starting from her chest, her breasts flare out until together they are wider than her torso. Her nipples are at roughly the same height as her belly button, and the bottoms of her breasts are at her hips. I have no idea what her cup size is, because I haven't seen any information out there that I would consider reliable. Reportedly, the website busty.pl is where she debuted, and they will only say that she's an "NR-cup". Clearly this is a publicity stunt to keep us guessing. I did see one blog claim she is a LL-cup, and from the looks of her that's probably not too far wrong!

Her breasts really have to be seen in motion to be appreciated. Each is bigger than her head, and they are clearly very heavy. Despite the fact that they hang low, they are incredibly firm. In fact, compared with a lot of huge-busted women, whose breasts become somewhat flattened out, Nelli's seem to have somehow managed to stay full. They are, all in all, an unbelievable pair of tits!

The bad news is twofold. First, she isn't a terribly active model. New photos and videos of her only appear sporadically. Second, whoever is photograhping her doesn't have a clue what to do with her. At first, she chose not to show her nipples, which is fair for a new model. But even now that she will, her photos are for the most part b-o-r-i-n-g. She never does much more than sit or stand there, moving very little and doing very little with her boobs. She might place her hands over her breasts and squeeze them (see the photo below) or gently rub them. But I've never seen those whoppers in real motion. In fact, I can't say that I've even seen a shot of her on hands and knees with her mams hanging down, and that's a classic pose that any tit-man would consider a necessity.

So my appeal to Nelli is this: Fire your photographer and find someone who will really show off your beautiful figure. You'll make your fans happy and gain legions of new ones, I'm sure.

Saline Breast Infusion

2009-05-01T13:59:00.000-07:00

NOTE: Nothing in this article should be taken as medical advice, and the author does not recommend that anyone follow the procedures described here. If not performed properly, they can result in infection, damage to the breast, or even death. If you do choose to try this, you do so entirely at your own risk. This article describes the author's personal experiences for purposes of entertainment only.

In recent years, I've experimented a bit with medical fetishes, especially temporary body modifications involving the infusion of saline. Saline is essentially saltwater, and it's a significant component of your body's makeup. Because of this, saline introduced into the body will be absorbed naturally over a relatively short time period. This is why saline-filled breast implants were introduced after silicone was deemed too dangerous.

I've injected and/or infused sterile medical saline into the breasts of a willing participant on several occasions. This was done following advice I'd read online, or gotten from other body modification enthusiasts. The result was a temporary increase in the size of the breasts lasting about 12 hours, with no ill effects other than some slight bruising afterward. For those who may be curious, I'll describe the techniques I've used here. In order to understand them properly, a good knowledge of the relevant anatomy is a must.

There are three approaches I know of for doing breast infusion. They are: beneath the breast, under the skin, and direct injections into the breast tissue itself. I've never tried this last approach, and wouldn't because I am concerned about the possibility of damaging the milk ducts or other structures there. However, I have seen it done in videos so clearly someone out there is willing to risk it! By contrast, the beneath the breast and under the skin approaches don't have this risk because the needle only goes into fat. I've done both of these and found the best results came from a combination of the two. Each technique is described separately below.

Before going any further, I should stress that it's extremely important to use aseptic technique in order to reduce the likelihood of infection. My partner thoroughly washes her breasts with soap and hot water beforehand, then applies isopropyl alcohol over the entire surface. I similarly wash and sanitize my hands. I've read recommendations from many people who prefer to use betadine instead of alcohol. I never allow needles to come in contact with anything other than the injection site or a sterile surface such as the packaging they came in, and I never use a needle for more than one session.

Under the Breast: This approach provides fullness and lift to the breast, and has the advantage that it's easier to do because I can leave the needle in a single location throughout the procedure. The basic technique is to insert a needle into the fold under the breast, where the breast meets the chest wall. Saline then drips (a.k.a. infusion) from a bag suspended above, under the force of gravity, and into the fatty tissue underneath the breast.

So you can understand what I'm describing, here's a glossary of the supplies I use:

Sterile saline: Either 500ml or 1000ml bags of sterile, medical-grade 0.9% saline solution USP used for IV infusion.
IV administration sets: This is the tubing that moves the saline from the bag to the needle.
1-inch 20g IV catheters: Also called 'venflons', these are the needles I use. The needle part is only used to insert the catheter into the breast, and then immediately removed. This eliminates the risk of doing some damage should the needle move around while it's in there.
Isopropyl alcohol: To sanitize both the injection site and my hands.
Alcoholic beverage: To lessen any pain that my partner might feel. I absolutely do not drink while I'm doing this! I also choose not to use any type of anaesthetic, because pain is your friend. If my partner was numb and I did something seriously wrong, we might not know about it until much later. That would be bad.

To make the procedure more comfortable for my partner, I warm the saline to body temperature in the microwave. This takes about 90 seconds for a 1000ml bag. I then attach the IV administration set to the bag and allow saline to flow out the tubing until there are no air bubbles in it. I then stop the flow and insert the IV catheter into the breast.

When inserting the needle, I make sure to lift the breast so that the injection site, at or just above the inframammary fold, is clearly exposed. The needle is then inserted near the center (side to side) of the fold in a direction that is parallel to the chest wall. Any lower angle would risk entering the chest wall itself. This is the reason I prefer short 1-inch IV catheters. They get beneath the skin, but have less chance of hitting something deep and important! If I've done it right, the needle should go into the fatty tissue beneath the breast (see diagram).

One needle is inserted beneath each breast. Once this is done, I hook the IV tubing up to the catheter and open the valve on the tubing slightly. I've found that this needs to be done very slowly, otherwise my partner experiences more pain than she can handle. As long as I can see a slow dripping at the top of the administration set, I know it's flowing. A burning sensation is normal as the saline enters the tissues of the breast. If this becomes too painful, I stop the flow completely until the pain subsides. We then start it up again.

The amount of saline I put in each breast depends on how it looks and how my partner is feeling. The most I've ever infused under the breast is about 250ml on each side. I'm concerned that placing more saline in a single location would be damaging. Given that my partner has C-cup breasts and she's had children (meaning they've lost fullness and there's some 'extra room' in there), this amount seems appropriate. If she were smaller or had firmer breasts to begin with, I'd use less. In her case, this amount provides a nice lift and additional fullness underneath. The only downside is that it can leave the upper portion of the breast looking less full because no fluid goes there. You can balance this out using subcutaneous (under the skin) injections, the second technique I mentioned. It's described next.

Under the Skin: Unfortunately, I have no photos or diagrams to help you visualize the procedure I follow, but I will link to some external photos that might help. This approach is just like doing subcutaneous infusion of fluids for dehydrated patients, so doing some research based on that might also help you understand what I'm up to. I use 23g "winged infusion sets" like the ones here and 60ml syringes like these. I get the luer lock, not the catheter tip. Saline is also required (0.9% sodium chloride), and was pictured above.

As with the previous procedure, before starting, I like to warm the saline for my partner's comfort. I then attach one of the needles to the syringe and insert the needle through the injection port on the saline bag. I draw saline into the syringe, however much I want to inject. It's a good idea to start slow, with perhaps 20ml per injection site. I've done as much as a full 60ml per site, but we had to work up to that.

I then find a location where I'd like to inject and pinch the skin between the thumb and forefinger of my left hand. I pull the skin up to create a small 'tent' shape, then insert the needle into the triangular side of the tent using my right hand. I never push it straight down into the breast, but rather aim it so that it will stay just under the skin. Once the needle is all the way in (3/4"), I draw back slightly on the plunger to make sure no blood enters the syringe. If it does, the needle has entered a vein which can be bad, and I then have to reposition the end of the needle. Once in a good position, I very slowly push the plunger on the syringe. The discomfort is usually greatest at the beginning. As the tissues expand to accommodate the fluid, I can go a little faster, but always take my time. The immediate result is a bulge under the skin which doesn't look very attractive, but quickly smooths out as the saline is absorbed into the surrounding tissues. If there is bleeding after removing the needle, I put pressure on the site with a piece of sterile gauze or cotton until it stops.

I perform these injections at several sites evenly spaced over the surface of the breast and the end result will be increased fullness overall. I'm careful of the nipple and areola, as these are especially sensitive areas and can be painful to inject. As a rule, I avoid them and instead make a ring of injections well outside the areola. Or, if I'm also doing infusion beneath the breast, I only make injections on the top and sides of the breast, because the bottom will get plenty of fluid from the saline drip.

I'm attaching before and after photos so you can see what my partner and I have achieved using this technique. They were from a 450cc (per breast) infusion. This is the size of a large breast implant. The results are fantastic, but unfortunately only last for 12 hours or so. Sometimes there is bruising after the fact from the injections under the skin, but this goes away over several days.

I've heard of people getting longer-lasting results by injecting a mixture of saline and surgilube, but I've never tried this. While it sounds appealing to have my partner's breasts remain enlarged, I wouldn't risk her health by putting something into her body that it might not be able to cope with.

If you appreciate what I've described here, there is a community of people who are into all types of extreme body modifications. Many of them are way beyond anything I would attempt or even be interested in. They include not only various type of saline infusion/injection, but piercing, cutting and more. If you are curious to see what other people do (and have a strong stomach), visit the BME website. Enjoy!

Nadia Williams: Before and After

2009-04-25T17:12:00.000-07:00

At the request of a reader who commented on my gigantomastia posting, here's a photo of Nadia Williams after her breasts lost their volume (bottom) as well as an earlier one (top). As you can see, the dramatic loss of size wasn't due to a breast reduction (although I expect she would have had one shortly after these were taken, if at all possible). Rather, it was the result of allowing her milk to dry up.

For those of you who aren't 'in the know' about such things, a woman's breasts become extremely swollen shortly after giving birth. Over a period of weeks, as they become accustomed to the demands of the new baby, they settle down a bit but will remain full for quite a while as long as the baby actively feeds. In Nadia's case, I would guess that because of the extreme size of her breasts, she probably didn't breastfeed her baby. She may have allowed her milk to dry up because breastfeeding was too difficult, her breasts were too heavy to manage, or even on her doctor's advice. I suppose we'll never know, as Nadia only briefly appeared on the scene and then disappeared again.

Nadia was featured on a German television show about ten years ago, and I was fortunate enough to find a few photos on the 'Net. The last couple of times I looked, there was nothing left to be found about her, so enjoy these very rare images!

On Breast Symmetry

2009-01-08T11:07:00.001-08:00

Our bodies are not symmetrical. Everyone has a right side that's at least a little bit different than their left. Try holding a mirror edge-on to your face so you can see what you would look like if both sides were the same. Now repeat the experiment with the other side of your face. You look like a different person each time, don't you? Well, even though it's not usually noticeable, this same asymmetry occurs in all parts of our bodies, including the breasts.

Women of any bust size can have unequal breasts, but we usually don't see this in the mainstream nude modeling world because it's considered unattractive. (As a side note, studies have shown that our sense of another person's attractiveness is directly related to the symmetry of their face.) And among women with "normal" sized breasts, there are so many beautiful models to choose from that I'm sure porn publishers see no reason to print photos of women with lopsided boobs. But the big-bust modeling world is different.

Women with huge bustlines are highly prized by breast lovers such as myself, so when a new one comes along a bit of breast asymmetry certainly won't stop her from gaining legions of fans. My first exposure to such a model was "Titanic" Toni Kessering (top) back in the 1980s. Modern examples include Miosotis (below) and Hitomi Tanaka (above), both of whom have very noticeable asymmetry in the size of their breasts. Yet this seems to make little if any difference in their popularity. Of course, the crowd they're so popular with have already based their fetish on the notion "the bigger the better", so I guess this should come as no surprise!

I include myself in this group, yet I'd by lying if I said that breast asymmetry makes no difference to me. Admittedly, while I find these models very sexy and am still turned on by their beautiful big bosoms, a part of my mind is always a bit put off by their unequal breast size. I find myself thinking, "If only the smaller breast had grown a bit more, imagine how amazing she'd be!" and sometimes even wondering how she might look if she got an implant on one side. Yes, it's true. Even a big natural lover like myself can occasionally think that breast implants would be a good idea. But in the end I deal with my reaction by finding the photos or video clips that do the best job of hiding the model's asymmetry and enjoying her as she is. After all, these are still incredibly beautiful women despite the fact that they're not geometrically perfect, and it's not as if I would turn any of them out of my bed! Would you?

The Facts About Bra Size

2008-12-31T18:30:00.000-08:00

I've noticed over the years that there is always some level of confusion regarding bra sizes. This should come as no surprise, I know, since the system of sizing that manufacturers use isn't intuitive or consistent. In fact, between the vagaries of cup sizes and bust measurements, it would be amazing if there weren't some confusion! In this post, I'll set the record straight on this all-important breast-related topic.

Bra sizes consist of two parts: a band size and a cup size. For example, in the U.S. a 36D bra has a 36-inch band and a D-cup. In other locales measurements may be based on centimeters instead of inches, but I'm only going to address U.S. sizing here. The two main points of confusion I'm going to talk about in this post are: band size vs. bust size, and cup sizes.

Band Size vs. Bust Size
The band size is based on the circumference of the torso just under the breasts, where the band rests when the bra is worn. However, the band size and the circumference are not the same. Generally, the proper band size can be estimated by adding 5 inches to the circumference measurement. Since bras are only manufactured with even-numbered band sizes (i.e. 32, 34, 36, etc.), a woman whose band size is odd will have to either add or subtract one inch from her measured size.

Bust size, on the other hand, is the measurement around the torso including the breasts and has nothing to do with bra sizes. We see bust size stated as part of a woman's "measurements", which usually include the circumference around her body at the bust, waist and hips. For example, the ideal hourglass figure is often stated to be 36-24-36 (not that I agree this is ideal, but that's for another post). But we can't determine the band size of this 'ideal' woman from the 36 inch figure, because the (cup) size of her breasts determines the relationship between the two numbers.

The natural confusion between band and bust size is further aggravated by the practice of some men's magazines and websites to publish measurements like "38D-24-36". Here, the cup size has been added to standard measurements, which is nice information to have. But it is now unclear what that first number is. Is it a band size, making her bra size 38D? Or is it a bust size, meaning her actual band size is smaller than 38 inches?

More on Band Sizing
For those who love details, here is a bit more on band sizes. The basic measuring guidelines I described above are not the final word in this area. Some people recommend taking an additional measurement around the torso above the breasts, just below the armpits. If this number is more than an inch or so different than the measurement taken below the breasts, it may be a better basis for the band size. Others recommend that instead of adding 5 inches to the circumference, a smaller number such as 2 or 3 inches should be added. In the end, since all bra manufacturers use slightly different sizing and all women are built differently, the true gauge of a properly sized bra is its fit and the comfort of it's wearer.

Cup Size
The other major area of confusion pertains to cup sizes. Basically, a woman's cup size is the difference between her bust size and her band size. If you subtract the band from the bust, each inch of difference is a different lettered cup size, with A = 1 inch, B = 2 inches, C = 3 inches and so on. For women whose bust-band difference is less than an inch, there is the AA size. Where the confusion arises is beyond the D-cup, where there are different naming conventions in use.

First, there is the approach that is probably the most traditional, in which D is followed by DD (double-D), DDD (triple- D), and so on. This method doesn't use any letters beyond D, and so is limited in how far it can practically go. A second approach, and the one I find most clear, simply continues through the alphabet with D-cup, E-cup, F-cup, etc. Finally, there is a sort of hybrid of these two which is very common despite the confusion it creates. Under this method, D-cup is followed by DD-cup, then by F-cup and FF-cup, H-cup and HH-cup, and so on, skipping every other letter of the alphabet along the way.

The three different cup size naming conventions are shown side-by-side in the table above. When you consider that a G-cup, a FF-cup and a DDDD-cup are all the same thing, it's no wonder that people get cup sizes wrong! (Of course, there is variation from manufacturer to manufacturer, so these sizes might not actually be the same when trying on bras, but the point is that they are meant to be equivalent.) And this confusion is compounded when magazines and websites that publish models' statistics don't understand cup sizing themselves. For example, I recently saw one super-busty model claim that her breasts had grown from a JJ-cup to a K-cup. Eh? Those are exactly the same!

I hope this article will bring some clarity to my fellow breast lovers, and help them understand and appreciate their favorite models' bra sizes. And if nothing else, I hope you enjoy the photos of bra-clad Alexis Love and Miosotis I've included. Happy New Year!

Does Areola Size Matter?

2008-12-06T07:11:00.000-08:00

I won't beat around the bush. The answer is YES, areola size does matter! Not from a functional perspective, mind you. But I find that small areolas simply don't do it for me, even if the woman's breasts are large. In fact, I find smaller areolas to be more attractive on smaller breasts, whereas large breasts really cry out for larger ones. It's a matter of proportion, as so much is with breasts. In fact, that would be a good topic for another post - how body proportions play a role in the attractiveness of breasts. But let's stick to the subject at hand for now.

If you look at the photo of Rachel Aldana shown here, the first thing you should notice is the incredible size and firmness of her breasts. Her bra size is 32K, and she's probably got the firmest breasts of that size I've ever seen, excluding women with implants of course. Typically, K-cup breasts hang fairly low, even if they're firm. These babies don't even reach her waist, which is amazing! Yet they don't really get me excited. (Crazy, huh?) I think the small diameter of her areolas is a key reason for this. There's a video floating around of her breasts being measured, and from that I know that those areolas are about 1-1/2 inches across, whereas the apparent width of each breast is several inches.

Now I don't have a mathematical formula that states what the minimum areola diameter should be for a given size of breast. But based on my personal sexual response to the thousands of breasts I've seen, I'd say that breasts this size deserve areolas at least 3 inches across, or twice the diameter of Rachel's. (Just in case anyone is wondering why I'm picking on Rachel, I'm not. I think she's great, but she just happens to be a perfect example of what I'm writing about.)

Now that I've answered the question of whether areola size matters, how about why? That's a tougher one. In an online discussion on just this topic, I read the best explanation I've heard so far: that small areolas tend to have a juvenile look. We all have small ones when we're children, but when women mature theirs increase in size. Perhaps being on such large breasts, the areola looks particularly small, thereby triggering something in our erotic minds that says, "that's a little girl!" and so shuts off any arousal. Another possibility is that we are hardwired to be drawn to the areola from birth. After all, one of its functions seems to be to act as a sign pointing nursing babies toward the nipple. So it might be that even as adults, we are drawn to that area of darker pigmentation, and the clearer it is the stronger that effect becomes.

These are just two ideas, not particularly borne out of any scientific facts that I know of. If anyone reading this has other ideas, please post them as comments.

So we've established that small areolas can detract from the appeal of a woman's breasts. But what about the other extreme? Can areolas be too large? Again, based on my personal response, I'd say 'yes', although the upper limit is not so clear cut. One example of a model with very large areolas is Eden Mor, shown here. I've chosen her to be my example because her breasts are in the same size range as Rachel Aldana's, albeit somewhat smaller. (They might not look smaller, but this is in part due to the fact that Eden's breasts sag much more than Rachel's.) Her bra size is 36HH, yet from her own measuring photos, it looks as if each areola is 5 inches or more across. Now that's big! Even at this size, I definitely still find Eden's breasts very attractive, although I think they're at the upper limit for me. Any larger and they would completely cover the ends of her breasts, and the thought of that isn't so appealing.

Of course, there are many aspects to a woman's areolas that may make them more or less attractive, such as color and texture, but I feel that size is the most important of these.

Computer Generated Breasts

2008-12-03T00:00:00.000-08:00

The inexorable advance of computer technology continues to bring more and more power to the desktop. We've now reached a point where realistic 3-D rendering can be performed by individuals on their personal computers. And, like everything else that's visually oriented, these techniques are being applied by huge breast lovers to bring their fantasies to life.

In particular, I've been marveling at the work of artist Ricky Java. He specializes in realistic computer-generated ladies whose breasts are the size of beach balls and nearly as round. His subjects always have flawless bodies and are amazingly realistic, right down to the color and texture of their skin. To make things even better, he often depicts his ladies lactating, milk dripping from the tips of their enormous mammaries. And for those who enjoy having a man in the picture, he also creates sex scenes in which the man's organ is just as incredibly oversized as the ladies' breasts! You can regularly find new material from Ricky Java in the BEArchive's User's Gallery.

Even 3-D animations are available now that are reasonably realistic. The best of these that I've seen are available on adult-empire.com. I've never subscribed to this site, but they publish a large number of sample clips. Perhaps my favorite among the ones I've seen has a man who comes into a medical office for a physical and ends up getting a lot more examined than he expected! A few short sample clips from this movie can be seen here. They're in Japanese and have the genital censoring that's required there by law, but even so they're quite a turn on.

I can't wait to see how technology transforms pornography next.

Bigger and Bigger

2008-07-13T23:12:00.001-07:00

I'm amazed at how more and more women with huge natural breasts have been emerging in the last few years. There was a time when it was incredibly rare to see over-sized breasts like Jenny Hill's. But these days, there seem to be an increasing number of hugely endowed women stepping forward to model. If you look for girls with J-cup busts or larger, the list includes Cheron (shown here), Miosotis, Alicia Loren, Fuko (shown below), Rachel Aldana, Sabrina Meloni, Alessandra Derya, Kate Bona, Sapphire, and more.

What possible reason could there be for this? Are women simply growing larger breasts than they once did? (See my posting Today's Larger Breasts for my detailed thoughts on this.) Maybe they are, but that alone that won't explain the flood of massive feminine chests out there. Personally, I think the Internet gets a lot of the credit for this trend. First, there are more well-established sites dedicated to huge breasts, including an explosion of single-model sites. This is part of the magic of the 'Net, where people with common interests can come together and share what they love. And no small part of that is the webmasters who go out and find these new models and, even more amazingly, convince them to pose!

Second, I suspect that more of the busty women who were already out there now feel free to model and post their pics because the 'Net has made nude modeling much more mainstream than it ever was in the days of magazines. The pent-up demand for big-tit porn has found its supply online, and in doing so has made us guys come to expect more porn, better porn, and more specialized porn than ever before. And as more model-hunters scour the world for our super-busty 'specialty women', those women become more likely to say 'yes' since they can readily see so many others like them baring it on various websites.

On this topic, I'd love to hear the thoughts of a woman has been approached to model, whether she went through with it or not. That would be the best possible confirmation (or counter) to my theory.

"Nice Bra"

2006-04-25T22:23:00.000-07:00

I live in California, and there are a lot of beautiful women here. Often I'll see a woman and think 'nice breasts'! But then I catch myself with the realization that what I'm appreciating is more likely to be her bra than her breasts.

These days, bras are marvels of imagineering. Just walk through the lingerie section of a department store and there on the racks you'll see some ready-made racks. (Sorry, I couldn't resist.) It seems that many bras go way beyond the old role of providing support, and instead provide something for women who aren't happy with what nature gave them. Sometimes it's additional size, accomplished through sewn-in padding. Other times it's shape, often created by a stiff sandwich of fabric and foam. And of course many times its both.

When these bras create a natural-looking bustline, I can appreciate them, although I still dislike the false advertising they imply. If I was dating a busty woman only to find out when we hit the sack that she didn't have the goods, I'd be upset I'm sure. Fortunately, I'm pretty good at telling real breasts from fake ones, but sometimes even an expert can't be certain.

Many times, though, the result of these stiff padded contraptions is not natural-looking at all, and I find myself wondering why a woman would walk out the door looking so fake. For example, when the bottom half of the breasts are full and round and the top half are sunken, with an obvious line between the two, you're clearly looking at a bra whose inhabitants can't fill their part of the bargain! And any woman whose breasts are high and pointy is clearly wearing an unnatural-looking undergarment which hearkens back to the bullet bras of the 1950's, an abomination in my book.

We need to get back to bras that provide a little lift and roundness without completely distorting or hiding the shape of a woman's actual breasts. Anymore, these are becoming an endangered species. A simple device whose cups are made of a soft fabric that conforms to the breast and provides a natural teardrop shape would do nicely. After all, the goal should be for the breasts to look natural, although somewhat higher and firmer than they otherwise might. This means that larger breasts (C-cup and above) should hang a bit lower on the chest with a slight droop. Although this is clearly not fashionable right now, it's what I think makes a beautiful bust.

Favorite Pose

2006-04-12T22:05:00.000-07:00

When a knowledgeable photographer shoots a busty model in the nude, there is a series of poses you can expect to see. One of these is the 'hands and knees' pose, which is often cited as a favorite because of what it does for the model's breasts. They hang down, which gives a good gauge of just how big they are: the bigger the breasts, the lower they hang. In many cases, this pose can also make them look even bigger than they otherwise do.

'Hands and knees' isn't a favorite pose of mine, however. Some breasts don't look so good in this position, because they can become narrow up where they meet the chest wall and larger down towards the nipples. This gives them a light-bulb-like shape that I don't find attractive. (This doesn't seem to be a problem for Diane Poppos in the photo here, however.)

Personally, I like to see a big-titted woman on her back. Now I know that the magazine publishers don't agree with me on this, because this is a pose that they often leave out. Why? Because when a woman with natural breasts lays on her back, her breasts flatten out. This often makes them look smaller. So why would I like this? Because it separates the huge breasts from the merely big ones. If a woman can lay on her back and still have her rack look impressive, then it truly is impressive!

Look at Diane here. Even on her back, her tits look really big. They spread out far enough to cover her armpits, yet they still stand high above her chest. Of course, part of this is because she has her hands beneath them, holding them in position. But even if she let them drop to their natural position, they might spread out a bit more, but they'd still look huge. Now that's a sexy pose!

Do a Fat Chick?

2006-04-05T21:49:00.000-07:00

I'm not a fan of fat women. I don't mind a few extra pounds, and even 20 or 30 extra can look good when they're well proportioned. But I'm not a so-called "BBW lover", the euphemism so often used these days for guys who are into obese women. And it seems that more and more women qualify as BBWs these days.

So when would I screw a fat chick? When she's got huge tits, of course! I'm not talking about big DD tits. No, a pair of DD's on a woman who's 50 lbs. overweight don't look like much of anything. But if she's got melon-sized melons, then my interest might be piqued.

A classic example of this was Roberta Smallwood. A BBW with huge natural tits, her first photos were sent in to Gent magazine by her boyfriend and published by them in 1991. Due to demand from breast lovers, she began modeling professionally and made a full career of showcasing her chest in a number of magazines and videos. Roberta quit modeling several years ago, but she went down in history as one of the classic busty BBWs.

Now Roberta isn't pretty, and she's carrying around way more weight than I like. But those breasts! Each one is the size of her head! I have no idea what her cup size is, but we're talking H-cup or larger here. So, yeah, I'd do her in order to get ahold of those babies. Just imagine how they'd bounce and rock as you pumped her, how your hardon would disappear in that vast cleavage, and how she could sit on top of you and smother you with her massive mams. *whew* It makes me hot just thinking about it.

Yes, I'd be willing - even eager - to lower my standards in any number of ways if the breasts are large enough to justify it. That's just how dedicated a tit-man I am.

The New European Models

2006-03-29T20:59:00.000-08:00

Ever since the Iron Curtain fell, it seems we've been seeing more and more big-tit models out of Eastern Europe. With the advent of the Internet, and with it the Internet porn industry, this trend has really accelerated. For example, the Polish website busty.pl has graced us with such busty ladies as Ewa Sonnet (shown here), Bea Flora, Maria Swan and of course the incredible Ines Cudna, who preceeded them all.

From Germany comes Bettie Ballhaus, sort of a European Danni Ashe, who not only has her own website but also has brought us legendary titters like Nadine Jansen and the unbelievable Czech model Milena Velba.

At the opposite end of Europe, England has long been known for having busty ladies who were willing to bare their chests as "Page 3" girls. Now they are joined by their sisters in the East, making Europe a strong contender for the top spot in the world where natural titters are concerned.

What's behind this? Do women simply grow bigger tits over there? Though it's possible, that seems unlikely. I think a better explanation has to do with European attitudes towards nudity. It's common over there for ladies to visit the beach topless. Bare breasts appear in television commercials and other advertisements. Unlike us puritanical Americans, they don't make such a big deal out of tits, and perhaps this translates into more women being willing to pose topless. After all, if they're going to display their assets in public anyway, why not get paid for it? And more often than not, I bet it's we horny American guys who are picking up the tab!

Breast Expansion

2006-03-20T22:11:00.000-08:00

Is the love of big breasts a fetish? I don't know about that. I've heard some people refer to it that way, but the term 'fetish' just doesn't seem right. According to the dictionary, a fetish is a fixation or obsession, and I'll readily agree that I have an obsession with big tits! But the way people usually use the word, there's also an implication that a fetish is an obsession that's somehow unusual, such as a foot fetish. I think everyone will agree that it's pretty unusual to be aroused by feet!

But not so with breasts. In fact, I dare say that a majority of men have a thing for breasts, and I'll even go so far as to say that of those that do, most are fixated! Women can attest to this as well as we men can, I'm sure. So is it correct to say that most men have a breast fetish? Maybe technically, but I doubt that they think of it that way.

Now an example of a real fetish is breast expansion. This is a small corner of erotica that involves breast growth, usually rapid and usually to extreme size. No, breast expansion (or BE as it's called) isn't something that happens in the real world, except for a few remarkable cases of gigantomastia (see my earlier post on this). Rather, BE is almost entirely confined to the realm of fantasy, mostly in the form of fiction and art. There are BE stories, BE drawings, and BE 'morphs', which are images that have been altered using PhotoShop or similar image-manipulation software so that the women in them have huge breasts.

Several years ago, I was really into the whole BE scene. The thought of a woman's breasts growing right before your eyes, until finally they are unbelievably huge, is a big turn on! If only such things were possible in the real world. Of course, since this is fantasy, the hard real-world questions tend to be overlooked. How can she live with breasts the size of trashbags? Aren't they so heavy she can't even move? Why is she getting turned on by her growing breasts - shouldn't she be scared shitless? And so on. But to a horny lover of big (and growing) tits, these issues are not so important and are often set aside.

I have to admit that even now I have a soft spot in my heart (and a hard spot in my pants) for BE, although I don't spend much time seeking it out. Still, it continues to appear as part of my erotic 'repertiore'. For example, the extremely twisted Japanese hentai game and anime called Bondage Game includes one female character whose breasts are enlarged to ridiculous proportions through some sort of injection. As her tits grow, they begin to produce milk in great quantities, making the theme even hotter. Unlike most American BE, this story doesn't have the woman enjoying her situation, since it's pretty rare for the Japanese to be concerned about the woman's pleasure. We Americans on the other hand seem to prefer to think that BE would be nearly as exciting for the woman as it is for us. Unfortunately, as with so many things erotic, this just isn't the case. BE is a fetish with an almost exclusively male following.

Women are from Venus

2006-03-02T21:43:00.000-08:00

Since I love big breasts so much, I've been trying to find a way to meet busty women on the Internet. I've tried posting on a number of sites, from dating sites to personal ads on craigslist to AdultFriendFinder, but I've had very little success so far. Why won't women respond to an honest man saying "I think big breasts are beautiful - share yours with me"? I'm not even asking for intercourse, I'd be happy just to touch them!

Before you laugh your ass off at such a stupid question, consider this: If a woman advertised for a man with a big cock, tight ass, or any other characteristic for that matter, you can bet she'd be inundated with responses! Men have no compunction about sharing their anatomy with almost any interested woman - and even interest isn't necessary for some! Are women so different from us that they have no interest in a purely physical interaction? Is it always necessary for an emotional bond to exist before a woman will share her physical charms?

If this is so, then it's ironic, because we men are rarely interested in forming an emotional bond with a woman unless there is physical/sexual compatibility first! It's truly amazing the sexes ever hook up...

Big Tits on TV

2006-02-14T22:06:00.000-08:00

Happy Valentine's Day! I'm sitting here in front of the TV watching a re-run of Just Shoot Me! This show starred Laura San Giacomo, and seeing her instantly reminded me that I haven't written anything in the blog for two weeks. Life has just been too crazy lately.

Anyway, Ms. San Giacomo sure has some big tits! The show ran for just a few years, I think, and during that time I seems that her breasts first got larger, until they were pretty huge, then got smaller again. She must have had a baby during that time, and she sure benefitted from the side-effects! She's pretty short, so I'd guess she must have gotten up to something like a DDD (F) cup at her zenith.

But this sort of thing is a rarity in Hollywood. How many extremely busty actresses make it in TV and movies? Sure, there are some notable exceptions, like Pamela Anderson (whose breasts are fake anyway). But for the most part, it seems that really top-heavy women are passed over when the casting is done. This is truly a shame, and definitely discriminatory. After all, there seem to be plenty of flat-chested women who can get parts!

Amazing Sighting

2006-01-31T21:35:00.000-08:00

I was at a well-known theme park yesterday and my 'breast-sense' was in high gear. I was surrounded by women of all builds, races and ages, and my eyes were constantly on the prowl. As I stated in my earlier post, this is almost a reflex action. I saw a lot of beautiful women, and a lot of large breasts, but most of the day went by without me seeing anything too exciting. What was most disappointing was that virtually every time I'd see a pair of big tits, the rest of the woman they were attached to would be much larger! Now, I don't mind if a woman is somewhat overweight, but a pair of D-cups on a heavy woman don't qualify as big tits in my book! And much of what I was seeing was along these lines.

There was one girl I encountered in line for a ride who seemed promising, but although there was a hint of bulk under her shirt, she was dressed in a way that mostly hid her bustline. She had beautiful blonde curls down to her shoulders, clear ivory skin, and a bright wide smile that would make your heart melt. And although she was wearing a scoop neck blouse, it was black, which hid her shape, and on top of that she was wearing a button-down shirt. While we were on the ride, I was able to catch a glimpse of her a few times, and when she was leaning one way or the other, I could see some appealing cleavage. I tried to follow her afterwards, but she quickly disappeared, so I was never able to confirm my suspicions about her figure. :-(

Then, as sundown was nearing, I was walking along and suddenly the crowd neatly parted. About 25 feet ahead and walking straight toward me I saw a young couple. The girl appeared to be about 20 years old, with dark hair and eyes, full red lips and flawless mocha skin. She had a radiance about her, and looked sweet, open and happy. She was wearing a skin tight peach-colored top with a plunging neckline that revealed long cleavage and a large expanse of tit flesh pressing in from either side. But even though a lot could be seen above the neckline, there was an even larger mass that was hidden below it. Because her clothes were so tight, the full shape and size of her bust was clearly in evidence. Her breasts were clearly packed inside a bra, being pushed up and in, and looking unnaturally firm and round. Still, the overall effect was electrifying.

If I had to guess, I would say she was at least an F-cup (DDD), and maybe as much as an H-cup. It was hard to tell in such a short time. But the exact size wasn't really important - rather, it was the contrast between her breasts and the rest of her body. She wasn't fat, like so many of these other women I had seen. She had a wonderful hourglass figure, with a small waist and full hips. Despite her tight top, I didn't see any unsightly rolls of flesh around her middle. Simply put, she had the face of an angel and a shape to die for!

As soon as I saw her, I was flushed with excitement. Here was the sexiest thing I had seen in a long time, sprung upon me as a last-minute surprise! Within seconds, she had passed me, and then I felt something that caught me off guard. Loss and regret. Having seen her and felt that excitement so briefly, I was quickly reminded that no matter how long I lived, I would never have a woman like her. I know this sounds silly, and these are not feelings that I'm used to having in a situation like this, yet they were there and for a split second I felt like crying.

I suppose I should have turned around and followed her. Under normal circumstances, that's what I would have done. But I didn't. I just wallowed in my pain for a few moments, then headed on.

Staring...I Can't Help It!

2006-01-21T21:36:00.000-08:00

I think we men are hard-wired to stare at women, and for a breast lover like myself this means staring at women's breasts. It's an uncontrollable impuse. When I'm walking down the street, I'm constantly glancing left and right, looking at the chests of the women I see. I try to be discreet, but I don't know how successful I am. When I talk to a woman, it takes an effort of will to look at her face and not her chest. In fact, I will look at her chest as soon as she looks away from me, providing an opportunity.

If you're a woman, you're probably asking "How can you be so rude?" I certainly don't mean to be rude, nor to offend. But this is part of the male nature, and not one that's easily controlled. You'd have to experience it to truly understand, but take my word when I say that it's almost an unconscious reflex. And for better or worse, it's simply part of who I am as a man.

Gigantomastia

2006-01-19T21:55:00.000-08:00

Gigantomastia (also known as macromastia) is a condition in which a woman's breasts grow to excessive size, usually as a result of pregnancy. For some reason, certain women's breasts are much more sensitive to hormonal signals that trigger growth. And while the result it a tit-man's dream, it's usually an unpleasant nightmare for the woman afflicted with the condition.

Perhaps the best known example of this condition was Isabelle Lanthier, due to the fact that she allowed her story to be published in the tabloids, and she went on at least one talk show. In her case, she experienced an increase from a 32B to a 52-inch bustline during the course of her pregnancy. Her breasts supposedly weighed 15 lbs. apiece, although one breast was markedly larger than the other, as seen in the photo here.

Now, I understand why these women would be unhappy having such large breasts. They must be very heavy and uncomfortable, not to mention hard to hide! But what amazes me is that none of them ever decide to become big-bust models. With such huge natural breasts, they could make a fortune if they wanted to. Not to mention the great lactation videos they could make as well. They wouldn't have to have sex, or even show their pussies, in order to make a mint. And you can't tell me that none of these women could use the money!

Another remarkable example of this condition was Nadia Williams. I don't have any of the particulars on Nadia other than that her breasts supposedly weighed 24kg - an incredible 58 lbs! The photos make this incredible figure almost believable. The picture here shows her breasts swollen with milk. In later photos, they're much less full and hang lower. An unusual thing you might notice is that Nadia's axillary breast tissue developed, giving her two small 'pseudo breasts' under her armpits.

Now, in an ideal world, Nadia would have had those axillary breasts removed, but kept the rest of the breast tissue. She could have then become the most popular big-bust model of all time! What a lost opportunity. *sigh*

Update 4/29/09: Since this particular post seems to be the most popular on my blog, and gigantomastia is a serious medical condition, I thought out of fairness I would provide a dose of the "reality" of the disease. Here is an article written by a woman who has suffered from the condition and claims that her breasts increased as much as 10 cup sizes due to one pregnancy. Her description is not erotic (at least not to me), but a good balance to the tone of my blog, which is. Check it out here.

They Drop to the Sides!

2006-01-07T00:22:00.000-08:00

I've heard women with large natural breasts complain that when they lay on their back, their breasts drop to the sides or "into their armpits". My wife has made this complaint, and her breasts aren't all that large. What's the big deal? The idea that breasts should remain up on the chest, high and perky, even though you lay down is ridiculous. I think it's one of those unrealistic expectations women have based on looking at models in the media.

In fact, this dropping to the sides is one of the key differences between natural breasts and fake ones. So you could argue that breasts that stay firmly up on top of the chest are fake-looking and unrealistic. I for one would make that argument, and I would go one step further to state that a good boob job should be indistinguishable from real breasts, and should drop to the side as well! (See the photo of Chaz here for an example.)

For better or worse, plastic surgeons don't seem to agree with me, and fake breasts continue to look and act fake. Yes, they're better than they used to be, but in my opinion they have a long way to go.

Breast Obsessed = Objectification?

2005-12-29T18:07:00.000-08:00

Many people when confonted with my all-consuming love of big breasts would no doubt villify me as an objectifier of women. And in part, I have to agree. But I absolutely refuse to be labeled as a man who only sees women as sexual objects. Hard as it may be for some people to accept, it is in fact possible for a man to view women differently depending upon the circumstances.

Now, I'm certain that the majority of those taking issue with my obsession would be women themselves, but this isn't really a surprise. Men and women view sex and love in fundamentally different ways, and most women probably can't relate to a man having two different perspectives on women. I see this as arising from the fact that sex and emotion (especially love) are intertwined for women, whereas for men they can be two entirely separate things.

Hence, a man can look at a woman's body and be aroused by it without making a statement as to whether he thinks she is smart or dumb, good or bad, or otherwise worthwhile as a person. At that point, he's driven by his sexual impulses which have nothing to do with how he feels about the woman. The same man can have female friends and co-workers whom he likes and respects without being sexually interested in them at all. The first perspective on women is a sexual one and the second a personal one, and they aren't the same, nor are they mutually exclusive.

So when I drool over big breasts, I'm really only talking about the breasts as objects. The woman attached to them isn't irrelevant, but she's outside the scope of my sexual focus. Were I to meet her personally, who knows? We might end up being great friends, in which case I would appreciate her from two points of view: as a great person and as a beautiful bustline!

Asian Girls are Flat-Chested

2005-12-22T21:51:00.000-08:00

There's a stereotype of Asian women as flat-chested. Is this true? Once upon a time, I thought so, and so I had no interest in them. However, as I've been confronted with evidence to the contrary, I've changed my mind.

Now, I do still think it's true that the average bust size among Asian women is smaller than that of women from most other races and nationalities. But they're definitely not all flat-chested! You can see this by looking at Japanese porn. The Japanese have a thing about big tits, and they seem able to find many examples of large-breasted women among their own people. Granted, their 'big' tits are not as large as, say, those here in America. But even among American women, models like Anna Ohura (shown here), Shouko Goto and Marina Matsushima have undeniably large breasts!

If you add to that the beauty of an Asian face, you suddenly have something of interest! And the icing on the cake for a big-tit hound like me is the fact that breast implants seem to be almost unheard of in the Japanese porn industry, so their big tits are not only big - they're big naturals!

Big Tit Manga

2005-12-16T22:24:00.000-08:00

Wildly popular in Japan are hentai manga, or 'dirty comics'. In these comics, sex of every type imaginable is rendered, from the commonplace to the fantastic to the horrific. And the Japanese love big breasts! So this art form is a boon for big breast fans, with dozens or even hundreds of big tit manga being published every year.

Making these comics even more interesting is the fact that artists can draw anything you can imagine. Combine this with the legendary sexual fetishism of Japanese pornography, and some very creative things result! These include large breasted women, huge breasted women, women whose breasts rapidly grow huge, women who squirt milk when they come, nearly unlimited variations on breast bondage, titfucking (paizuri), oversized nipples, cocks for nipples, injecting things into breasts, pumping milk out of breasts, etc. etc. etc.

One of the best of the big tit manga, from an artistic point of view, is the Blue Eyes series by Tohru Nishimaki (にしまき　とおる). The realistic way in which he draws his characters and the beauty of the female ones is very appealing. His manga contain almost none of the fetishism I just described, and would probably not be considered out-of-line here in the U.S. if it weren't for the fact that his main characters, Tatsuya and Maria, are a teenage boy and girl. In Japan, this is not considered wrong, and the English-language translations of Blue Eyes deal with this by simply adding a couple of years to their ages.

My favorite character in Blue Eyes is Claire, a cousin of the main character Maria. Claire is a shy virgin who is embarrassed by the size of her breasts. Although all of the female characters have big tits, Claire's are huge. She supposedly suffers from a condition that causes an abnormal accumulation of fat in the breasts. Modeled by Nishimaki after the legendary (yet controversial) model Tina Small, Claire sports a 201cm (79") bustline. Needless to say, as a lover of big breasts, I find this hot! Through three volumes of the series, Tatsuya convinces Claire to give him her virginity, to be unashamed of her breasts, and even to have sex in a public place.

Although Blue Eyes is my favorite, there are many other big tit manga that I like. Maybe in another post I will discuss them.

Lactation

2005-12-09T22:42:00.000-08:00

For the longest time, I didn't really have any interest in lactating breasts. Then my wife got pregnant for the first time. Her breasts got a bit larger, but nothing dramatic. Then she gave birth, and once her milk came in, Wow! Her breasts became full and firm. Her nipples became fat and swollen. And best of all, they squirted warm, sweet milk.

Soon, milking became a regular part of our sex. I would squeeze her milk all over my cock and balls and she would give me a slippery handjob, or better yet she would suck her milk off of me. During intercourse, she would get on top and I would milk her until it covered my chest and face. And when her breasts became so full that she needed relief, I would 'help' her by drinking as much of her sweet milk as I could. This would inevitably lead to a nice handjob or more.

After that, I began seeking out porn that involved lacation. I was surprised to find a fair amount out there, including dedicated websites. I guess I'm not the only one who finds milky breasts a turn on! I also discovered them featured prominently in a lot of hentai manga (X-rated Japanese comics). It seems that the Japanese not only have a thing for big tits, but for milk as well. There I found even more exotic themes, like women who squirt milk when they come, and women who are bound and milked like cows using milking machines.

All these things are now turn-ons, and I have expanded the scope of my porn collection to include them. There's nothing quite like milky breasts, perhaps because they are so interactive, or maybe because they are reminiscent of the male orgasm (i.e. a cum-squirting cock). Regardless of the reason, I now appreciate just how hot a lactating mother can be!

Today's Larger Breasts

2005-11-29T21:44:00.000-08:00

Have you noticed that breasts seem to be getting bigger these days? I sure have. Just walking around Southern California, where I live, I see far more big tits than I saw a decade ago. And this isn't my imagination. According to recent statistics, the average cup size in the United States has increased from a B to a C. So the logical thing to wonder is: Why? Here are my ideas.

I suspect that there are really two different things going on here. First, I think that as the statistics state, women's breasts are in fact bigger than they used to be. This is most likely due to the fact that women (as all Americans) are larger than they used to be. When they gain weight, most women's cup size (and band size) go up due to stored fat.

But along with this actual increase in the average bustline, there are apparent increases driven by the fact that being busty is now in fashion. This has led to greater popularity for breast augmentation surgery. What's more, the 'target' size for these operations has increased in recent years. According to a recent magazine article I read, plastic surgeons are seeing more and more women whose ideal cup size is a large C or even a D-cup. This naturally leads to us seeing fewer small breasted women and more with big (albeit fake) ones.

This apparent increase in size also has another source: the various breast enhancing solutions for women who don't want or can't afford surgery. These include padded bras, water bras and inserts for bra cups. And although they must lead to eventual disappointment for legions of men, women who desire fashionably large chests often resort to these devices.

So, for tit hounds like myself, this leads to many questions when we're out and about and we spy a busty babe. Are those real? Are they implants (if you care)? Or does she just have a really good bra? And if you're interested in getting close to such a lady, these take on a certain urgency. After all, what guy wants to learn only after getting his dream girl in bed that it was actually her lingerie he was attracted to? ;-)

More Favorite Models

2005-11-28T21:46:00.000-08:00

Continuing my previous post in which I started listing my favorite models...

Milena Velba

The only word to describe this woman is Wow! Milena recently burst onto the big-bust scene with a gargantuan pair of milk-filled breasts. Actually, there are older photos of her out there, so she's not a total newcomer, but her notoriety began within the past couple of years after her pregnancy-related breast growth.

There's no question in my mind that her tits are even bigger than Yolanda's, which is especially hard to believe considering she's not a plumper and she's white. (Yes, it is true IMO: black women have larger tits.) Top that off with the incredible firmness that accompanies lactation, and Milena probably has the most spectacular breasts I've ever seen.

As if this wasn't enough, she was graced with a very pretty face, making her virtually irresistable in my book. In fact, I'm hard pressed to come up with anything negative to say about Milena. She was left with the usual post-pregnancy tummy issues, which she mostly hid from the camera, but I can hardly hold that against her, and even this was taken care of recently by a tummy tuck. It's also somewhat of a disappointment to see that her milk has dried up and her tits have lost some volume. But they still look spectacular, all things considered, and I'd fuck her in a second, no questions asked!

Chaka T

Not as much of a favorite as any of the previous models, but still with an awesome set of juggs is Chaka T. With remarkably firm breasts in the neighborhood of H-cups, Chaka has physical assets to spare. What's more, her willingness to appear in hardcore videos allows one to enjoy her to the fullest. She has a fun and playful manner that makes it seem as if she's really enjoying herself, and her tits look even better in action than they do in photos.

The only negative thing I can say about her is that her areolas are smaller than I like. And this raises an aspect of my breast preferences that I can't really explain. Rationally, one might expect smaller areolas to look better, since they make the rest of the breast look larger by comparison. For some reason, though, this is not the case. At least not as far as I'm concerned. On breasts this big, I'd really like to areolas that are more than 3" across. Despite this Chaka T is undeniably hot hot hot!

My Favorite Models

2005-11-27T21:25:00.000-08:00

As I said in an earlier post, I've been admiring large breasts since I started reading my dad's Playboys in 7th grade. Over the intervening 30 years or so, I've looked at a helluva lot of tits. As a result, I can think of many many examples of big-breasted beauty, and there's really no way I could settle on a favorite. So, what I'd like to do in this blog is acknowledge just a few of the models I consider the sexiest. I'll start with two here, and add more in later posts. No doubt I won't get around to listing them all, but you should get a good idea of what I like.

Devon Daniels

A big-bust star from the late 80s, she's still considered a classic for good reason. At a mere 5 feet tall, Devon sported a pair of DDD-cup breasts (same as an F-cup) and, according to Gent magazine, measured 49.5 inches around her bust. This latter fact is questionable, but nevertheless Devon had amazing proportions.

She was also known for having so-called 'hangers', meaning literally that her breasts hung low on her chest. And while I agree that they did, it's not like this is unusual for such large breasts. In fact, it would be much more unusual to find a pair of DDD tits that don't hang!

In addition to mere breast size, other things that make Devon rate so highly on my list include her high bust-to-waist ratio (which makes them look even larger than they are), the wonderful natural bounciness of her breasts in motion, and her youth (she was a 19-year-old college student when she modelled for Gent).

Yolanda (aka Miss Twin Volcanoes)

Another model from the late 1980s, Yolanda was brought to us by Wild Bill, and thankfully appeared in a number of his videos. I've never seen a cup size stated for her, but her bust measurement was published as 60". I doubt this was exaggerated much if at all.

Not only did Yolanda have one of the largest busts, natural or otherwise, ever to make its way into the pages of the big bust magazines, but her bust-to-waist ratio must have been at or near the top of the all-time list. Yes, she carried a few extra pounds in her tummy, hips and ass, but given the size of her tits, she was downright slim! In addition, she had huge areolas the size of a man's hand and her breasts easily hung down past her navel. If fact, when sitting down, her breasts actually rested in her lap!

One of my favorite things about Yolanda is the fact that she did some videos while she was lactating. Her already huge tits became even bigger when swollen with milk, and she was able to squeeze vast quantities from her udders. This is really on display in the video Erupting Volcanoes from Wild Bill, which remains one of my all-time favorites.

Fake vs. Natural: The Age-Old Question

2005-11-23T20:55:00.000-08:00

I know that a lot of tit hounds could care less whether a woman has naturally large breasts or implants. In the minds of some, the only things that matter are size and shape, and if you want them really big, really firm and really round then implants are the way to go. But to me, implants are much less appealing in many cases.

The main reason is that many boob jobs just do not look natural. Sure, they're firm and round, but so often the shape is just wrong. Real breasts are not supposed to be high and firm when they get above, say, a D cup. This is especially true when a woman is on her back. Yet plastic surgeons continue to make women look like they've got a pair of balloons glued to their chest. Why does it matter? Because an unnatural looking pair of breasts is distracting! I can't focus on the beauty of tits that look fake, especially if it's obvious.

That's not to say that all implanted breasts look bad. There are definitely models who've had surgery and look good enough for me to enjoy. But until they can (or will) start making enlarged breasts look more natural, I will focus most of my attention on big naturals.

Related to this is the fact that fake boobs don't move like they're supposed to. In some cases, they hardly move at all! I find the motion of large natural breasts mezmerizing. They jiggle, they shake, they swing, they bounce. Watching a big pair of tits flow back and forth across a girl's chest as she gets fucked hard on her back - whew - that's hot! You just don't get any of that with implants.

Finally, there's the simple fact that the real thing is rare and therefore special by its very nature. Anyone can have plastic surgery, and they can choose to make their breasts as large as they like. But a really big pair occurring naturally is not common. Of course, a heavy woman will tend to have larger breasts simply due to the additional fat she carries, and fat breasts are not the same as big naturals IMHO. So what constitutes that 'rare' and special pair? On a petite woman, perhaps a pair of D cups, definitely a pair of DDs. On a taller but otherwise slim woman, natural F-cups would be very attractive. And a heavy woman needs to have even larger breasts in order to achieve that 'wow' factor.

So, for me, size matters but it's not just about size. It's about a certain look that I find special and sexy, and a big part of that is being natural.

How I Came to Love Big Breasted Women

2005-11-22T23:01:00.000-08:00

I first started to notice breasts around 6th grade. I would have been 11 years old at the time. I had already taken a prepubescent interest in girls, having 'fallen in love' with a classmate in 3rd grade, only to have my heart broken when she moved at the end of the school year. But 6th grade was different. I had a crush on a girl named Dana who I thought was sooooo cute. But she lacked something that some of the other girls now had, and that 'something' was catching my attention as much as Dana's looks.

Granted, at that age what breasts the girls had were small, but they were mezmerizing anyway. In fact, they made such an impression on me that 30 years later, I still remember the name of the girl with the biggest breasts in my 6th grade class: Tanja Butler. And from that point on, there have been only two physical features I've found attractive in a woman: a beautiful face and a big pair of breasts.

It was perhaps a year later that I took an interest in my dad's Playboy collection, which he hid in the top of his closet. I would excuse myself from the dinner table before anyone else, sneak into his room, grab a magazine from the closet and take it into the bathroom. After looking at a number of issues, I began to establish a list of favorite models: Janet Lupo, Cynthia Myers, and Marilyn Lange among them. The one feature they had in common, of course, was a pair of large breasts. And since this was in the mid-70s, none of these girls had implants. They were all-natural. This is probably why I still prefer big naturals to implants, even now.

So that, in a nutshell, is my 'origin' story: How I came to love big breasted women.

The Blog Exists!

2005-11-22T21:27:00.000-08:00

I've thought about doing this for a long time. I'm constantly thinking about breasts, and yet I have nowhere to express those thoughts. Maybe this is the solution.

The only problem is that, when it comes to writing, I'm pretty lazy. It takes a lot of effort to write regularly, and I'm just no good at that. So let's just see what happens, shall we?